Ramprakash comparisons 2006
| |
|
Innings |
Runs |
Balls |
R/R |
% of Total |
Pts |
| Ramprakash |
LV v Worcs 08-08-06 |
576 |
196 |
256 |
0.766 |
34.028 |
31.003 |
| Lehman |
LV v 13-05-06 |
382 |
193 |
317 |
0.609 |
50.524 |
34.352 |
Despite scoring less runs, Lehmann achieved 3.349 more points due to scoring a high percentage of the total runs scored. They both achieved a 3pt bonus; Ramprakash for achieving R/R >0.75 and Lehmann for achieving >40% of team total. However, Ramprakash was awarded 3.403 for his % of total runs, whereas Lehmann achieved 5.052 for his.
See why Lehmann was the top batsman overall.
After applying the 2nd Division 20% weighting, Ramprakash would have ended up with 24.802 points.
- Ramprakash average R/R in the LVCC was 0.598
- Lehmann’s average R/R in the LVCC was 0.799
Before weighting, 12 out the top 20 overall MVP’s were in the 2nd division.
|
Ramprakash |
V |
Masceranus |
| LVCC |
300.825 (12) |
|
360.131 (16) |
| C&G |
18.263 (4) |
|
66.965 (7) |
| Twenty20 |
76.506 (10) |
|
69.374 (8) |
| Natwest Pro40 |
52.967 (7) |
|
83.329 (8) |
| Total |
448.561 |
|
579.790 |
Above is a breakdown of points scored in each competition and the total scored overall.
Apart from the Twenty20, where Ramprakash scored some 7 more points, overall Masceranus consistently outscored Ramprakash in the rankings due to his all round contribution. After weighting the LVCC & PRO40 competitions, Ramprakash would end up with 377.803 overall against Masceranus' 579.790.
In the brackets is the number of games played in each competition. This obviously has a major bearing on the amount of points achievable.
|
